Search This Blog

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Friday, February 10, 2012

The Liturgical Functions of Consecrated Women in the Byzantine Church by Valerie A. Karras

Theological Studies 66 (2005)


[Although the ordained order of deaconesses vanished in the Byzantine Church, some women continued to fulfill, either informally or formally, various liturgical functions in public church life. The author examines' the art-historical and textual evidence of three groups of women: noblewomen who participated as incense-bearers in a weekly procession in Constantinople; matrons who helped organize and keep order in a monastic church open to the public in Constantinople; and the possibly ordained order of myrrhbearers in the Church of Jerusalem.]

Women continued to play active and ecclesiastically recognized liturgical roles in the processions, vigils, and services of the Byzantine Church even during and after the decline of the ordained female diaconate by the late twelfth century. The Byzantine Church, following historical Christian tradition, excluded women from the ordained orders of the presbyterate (priesthood) and the episcopate based on an anthropology of separate and unequal roles for the sexes, and grounded biblically in the Pauline prohibition against women speaking in church (1 Corinthians 14: 34), and particularly on the deutero-Pauline injunction against women teaching (1 Timothy 2:11-12), the latter argued as a result of woman's role in the Fall from grace in the Garden of Eden. The argument from 1 Timothy 2 was used, for example, by the late fourth/early fifth-century archbishop of Constantinople, John Chrysostom, specifically to justify the exclusion of women from the priesthood.

However, the biblical injunctions against women speaking and teaching were not, even in apostolic times, interpreted as a complete exclusion of women from all liturgical and pastoral functions, including charismatic preaching and ecclesiastical offices. For example, the context of 1 Corinthians 14:34 clearly indicates that the "speaking" that was prohibited to women was of the question-and-answer variety, since the following verse instructed women to ask their husbands at home if they needed to know something. That the injunction was contextual is further supported, only three chapters earlier (1 Corinthians 11:5), by Paul's directing women who prophesy to cover their heads. "Prophesying" was, of course, public preaching, particularly on moral issues, and the office of prophet was a charismatic office of the early Church. As for 1 Timothy, chapters 3 through 5 outline the qualifications and responsibilities of various clergy or officials in the church community. Among those discussed by the writer of the pastoral epistle are two groups of women: Widows (1 Timothy 5:1-16) and female deacons (1 Timothy 3:11)'7. The consecrated, or "enrolled" (1 Timothy 5:9), order of Widows8 disappeared, judging from the lack of extant evidence, sometime after the middle of the sixth century.9 In their lifestyle, their spirituality, and their pastoral and liturgical roles, though, they provided important links to two other women's orders on the rise from the late third or early fourth centuries: female monasticism and the ordained order of female deacons.1° Moreover, the liminal nature of the Widows—"enrolled" or consecrated, and with certain liturgical functions, but not ordained—prefigured the nature of consecrated or enrolled women serving similar functions in the Byzantine Church.

In the early Christian period, the various ordained and consecrated orders and informal roles that women played in church life reflected a variety of needs and concerns, including: (1) performance of pastoral and liturgical activities serving the needs of women in the community, particularly those needs created by the restrictions of Eastern Mediterranean societies that segregated and secluded women; (2) recognition of women's historical contributions to the ministry of Christ and to the apostolic Church; and (3) formal ecclesiastical acknowledgement of the contributions of contemporary women, especially those with money and influence." Many of these needs and concerns, such as the baptizing of adult women converts and the conveying of the Eucharist to the homes of housebound women, were met through the order of the female diaconate. With the apparent demise of that order, these continuing needs and concerns had to be met in other ways.

In the Byzantine period, there were women who usually bore some sort of formal ecclesiastical title and who were organized more or less formally into consecrated or ordained orders. These consecrated women functioned in public settings, either associated with the metropolitan church, or, in one case, with a male monastery that provided for liturgical participation by the faithful, both male and female, of the surrounding neighborhood. All of these ecclesiastical women have one thing in common: they reflect the Byzantine Church's recognition that the various needs of a mixed community require the pastoral and liturgical participation of women as well as men.

My article examines three "orders" or groups of women active in Constantinople or in Byzantine Jerusalem in the tenth through thirteenth centuries: (1) a trio of women whose unique contributions to the orthodoxy of the Church were recognized by their special participation as incense bearers in the most important and well-known weekly liturgical procession in Constantinople; (2) a quartet of women who assisted in the public liturgical functions of a men's monastery in Constantinople; and (3) an order of women in the Church of Jerusalem called the myrophoroi (myrrhbearers).

PROCESSIONAL INCENSE-BEARERS

Although active liturgical roles for women were ecclesiastically prescribed and thus recognized in the forms of titles and specific consecrated or ordained orders for the other two groups of women examined in this article, such does not appear to be the case in this instance. A frescoes preserved in a monastery church in the Epirote city of Arta in northern Greece depicts a weekly procession in Constantinople, providing an interesting piece of artistic evidence of the rare processional role of a few select women based on their personal, historical connection with certain important ecclesiastical events in the late 13th century.

The Arta monastery of the Panaghia Vlachernitissa, originally a male monastery, was converted to a women's monastery sometime before A.D. 1230. A few decades later, the monastery church, most likely constructed originally in the tenth century, was expanded into a three-domed and three-aisled basilica, and decorated with Byzantine frescoes and other artistic and architectural elements. Among the 13th-century decorations of the convent church extant today are a sculpted marble templon, a mosaic floor, and, most outstandingly, a unique fresco, preserved in fragmentary form on the southernmost arch on the west side of the narthex, depicting the procession (or litany) of the famous icon of the Theotokos Hodegetria in Constantinople.'' The weekly Tuesday procession of the city's palladium through the capital is described in numerous sources, both Byzantine and foreign, over a period of at least three centuries, with the earliest accounts dating to the twelfth century.

The fresco is remarkable for two reasons. First, it is unusual to find depicted in a church a historical religious ceremony, particularly an outdoor procession. Most frescoes depict scenes from the life of Christ, the Theotokos, and the saints. Benefactors are occasionally shown with Christ or a patron saint, but usually set against a gold background, i.e., outside of any historical or social context. Secondly, the occasional religious events that are depicted in icons and frescoes, such as the ecumenical councils, generally do not contain women. The icon depicting the final restoration of the icons following the Council of Haghia Sophia in A.D. 843 is an exception because the Empress Theodora is shown, but she herself convoked the council; moreover, it is Patriarch Methodios who takes center stage, not Theodora. Myrtali Acheimastou-Potamianou theorizes that the reason for the unusual iconographic subject in this monastery church far from Constantinople, and in particular the prominent presence of three women at the forefront of the procession, has to do with the connection of the monastery's patron to two significant synods held in the Vlachernae church in the capital and in Adramyttion, and to the "celebrity" status attached to the mother of the patron, who opposed the emperor, her own brother, for the sake of the orthodoxy of the Byzantine Church.

In 1274, the Byzantine emperor Michael VIII Paleologos for political and military reasons submitted himself formally to the pope and the Church of Rome at the Second Council of Lyon, and promised that the Byzantine Church would immediately follow his steps by reuniting itself with Rome as well. Instead, the Byzantines, clergy and laity alike, vociferously rejected the agreement. Michael's attempts to win forcibly the approval of his Church and Empire led him to persecute and imprison those opposed to the union, including his own sister, Irene-Eulogia. Epiros, with Arta as its functional capital, had been independent of Constantinople since the Latin conquest of 1204, and hence became a haven for opponents of Michael's policies who were fleeing potential imprisonment.

When Michael died in 1282, his son Andronikos reversed his father's religious policies, immediately releasing those imprisoned by Michael, such as Irene-Eulogia. A game of "musical chairs" ensued, with the patriarchal throne as the prize, that pitted John Bekkos, a pro-unionist elected under Michael, against Joseph, who both succeeded Bekkos and preceded him (Joseph had resigned earlier, under Michael, in protest of the union). Finally, the following year, Gregory II of Cyprus was elected as the new patriarch, in part thanks to the Bishop of Kozyle in Epiros, who was serving as ambassador to Constantinople for the Despot of Arta, Nikephoros. Not coincidentally, Nikephoros's wife, Anna Kantakouzena Palaeologina, was the daughter of the recently released Irene-Eulogia. Also not coincidentally, the new patriarch, Gregory, convoked in April of 1283, at the Church of the Vlachernae in Constantinople, a synod that condemned Bekkos and deposed all unionist bishops; later that same year another synod met in Adramyttion, cementing the victory of the anti-unionists. Pachymeres records that Irene-Eulogia, her daughter Anna, and her other daughter, Theodora, were in attendance.

Acheimastou-Potamianou finds the confluence of these events significant evidence of the probable rationale for the depiction of the procession of the Theotokos Hodegetria and the prominent place given to three women in that procession on the wall of the monastery church in Arta: There is no doubt that at this time the established Tuesday procession in Constantinople took on greater magnificence and meaning. We may firmly state that the pious Eirene-Eulogia, a "celebrity" following her imprisonment, could not have failed to take part, along with her two daughters, in the procession of the icon of the Hodegetria, the palladium of the Capital, either in one or more of the Tuesday processions or in a special litany of the icon conducted to celebrate the events that had taken place. The memory of the ceremony in Constantinople in which the three ladies participated is, perhaps, preserved in the fresco of the Vlacherna monastery. Very likely, the recent death of Eirene-Eulogia in 1284 while Anna Palaiologina was still in Constantinople prompted the selection of this particular scene with its emotional charge. The representation of the litany in the women's monastery of the Vlacherna, the burial church of the family of the despots, was probably intended as a memorial service for the mother of Anna, and served to immortalize EireneEulogia with her two daughters at a propitious time in the position of Orthodoxy, on behalf of which she had struggled with such great zeal

Thus, an important liturgical procession in Constantinople remarkably included women in a visibly prominent role. It was unusual for women to play an active role in liturgical processions since the Byzantine practice of secluding women, especially upper-class women, meant that they were discouraged even from appearing in public outside of church and at important events such as funerals. Matrons would have had more freedom than young, unmarried women, who were much more rigorously secluded, so it was probably not unusual for married women to participate in the weekly procession. Nevertheless, to have such a visibly public and active role was extraordinary. Even the deaconesses of the Great Church in Constantinople do not appear to have taken part in the elaborate procession that occurred during the part of the Divine Liturgy known as the Great Entrance. Thus, Eirene-Eulogia and her daughters Anna and Theodora were honored in this striking way as women of wealth and privilege who exhibited strong and self-sacrificing dedication to the Byzantine Church.

Part of the unusual public nature of their participation is represented in their holding some sort of liturgical vessels. Unfortunately, the poor state of preservation of the fresco and the small size of the figures makes it unclear what exactly the women are holding in their hands. It is likely from their shape that the objects held by the two women in front of the third are either incense burners, as Acheimastou-Potamianou believes, or
pyxes (incense holders). Their holding either of these vessels would further underscore their prominent liturgical position in the procession. More over, their role as incense-bearers would also recall the myrrh-bearing women of the Gospels, who remained steadfast in their loyalty to Jesus Christ. Thus, these women's dedication was recognized by the Byantine Church's placing them prominently in an important procession, and doing so in a manner that equated them with the apostolic women of Scripture.
Interestingly, their liturgical participation linked them to another group of women who also deliberately imaged these same women recorded in Scripture• namely, the myrrhbearers of the Church of Jerusalem, who will be described later after the graptai.

THE GRAPTAI OF THE PANTOKRATOR MONASTERY

As already noted, although the order of Widows and later the order of deaconesses died out in the Byzantine Church, the pastoral and liturgical needs that they met continued to exist. One group of women who partially met those needs served, curiously, at the male monastery of the Pantokrator in Constantinople.

The monastery of Christ the Almighty (Pantokrator) was founded by either the Byzantine emperor John II Komnenos or his wife, Irene, in the 1130s. An interesting feature of the monastery was its triple church: three physically connected churches built at different times and dedicated, respectively, to Christ Pantokrator (south), the Theotokos Eleousa, or "Merciful" (north), and the Archangel Michael (center). A hospital and an old age home were also attached to the monastery.

As with Byzantine women's monasteries, so too the Pantokrator monastery followed the principle of seclusion or abatos that is, it did not admit members of the opposite sex into the monastic foundation proper: "Women will not enter the monastery and the monastery will be a forbidden area for them, even if they are distinguished ladies and are adorned by a devout life and a noble birth." Because the clergy needed for the sacramental life of the monastery could be found within it, a male monastery was, of course, able to exclude women far more than a female monastery could exclude men. Nevertheless, although a monastery needed a certain amount of seclusion from the world in order that its members could devote themselves to their spiritual practices, Byzantine monasticism was no more removed from the world than was medieval Western monasticism. As Rosemary Morris has remarked, monastic "contacts with the secular world were often close and frequent and, though monastic tradition might decree the opposite, complete seclusion—a life 'in the world but not of it' —was, in fact, rarely practiced."

In fact, while never developing the mendicant orders that became prevalent in the West, neither did the Eastern Christian monastic tradition practice the complete seclusion found in Western cloistered orders, except in the most extreme type of anchorite (solitary) monasticism. From the beginnings of monasticism in Egypt and Palestine, there was a steady intercourse between monks and laypersons. Hospitality was a basic monastic virtue; the Basilian (and Macrinan) style of monastic life included charitable activities for the lay faithful in the neighboring community; and, as Morris has also noted, "[c]entral to the relationship between monks and laity was the role of the monk as spiritual guide." This social, philanthropic, and spiritual monastic outreach was particularly true of coenobitic monasteries in urban areas, such as the Pantokrator in Constantinople. Its hospital, old age home, and off-site sanatorium for lepers showed its founder's commitment to monastic philanthropy.

Pantokrator's spiritual leadership, too, was obviously important to its founder. The outermost church of the monastic complex, the Eleousa, served as a liminal area between the abatos of the monastery and the world outside the monastery walls, providing spiritual nurture to the public with a regular calendar of services. The typikon (monastic rule) for the monastery mandated for the Eleousa church a large number of clergy, whose duties included celebrating for the people of the city a weekly Friday night vigil, replete with a procession of banners into the church. The section enumerating the clergy attached to the Eleousa listed a total of 50 clergy: priests, deacons, chanters, lamplighters, etc. In addition to the 50 clergy, the section also mandated extra orphans to serve as alternate lamplighters when there were not enough "certified" orphans Finally, completing the section on clergy, but excluded from the clergy count of 50, was the founder's description of four women "with the rank of graptai":

[W]e decree that four respectable women of propriety, mature in age and character and with the rank of graptai, should carry out their duties, two in one week and the other two in the next, and the four of them should be present on a Friday evening and watch over the church and what happens there. For we have decreed that these orphans and graptai should exist for this reason, that they should conduct the procedure of the meeting of the holy banners every week, carry out the service to those brothers who gather by refreshing them all with water, and see to the oversight of the church and the things connected with it.

So, according to the typikon, people were needed to care for a monastic church that was open to the public on a regular basis, in order to offer visitors appropriate hospitality, and especially to ensure order during what was obviously a popular and well-attended weekly vigil. In earlier times, consecrated Widows or ordained female deacons would have served such functions as doorkeepers and maintainers of order. However, as mentioned above, by the 13th century, both of these orders had disappeared from the Byzantine Church. Therefore, the emperor or empress, recognizing the pastoral and liturgical need, given the social segregation of the sexes in Byzantine culture mentioned earlier, for women as well as men to fulfill these tasks, appointed four women "with the rank of graptai" to serve the faithful visiting the monastic church throughout the week, rotating in teams of two on a weekly schedule, with all four graptai serving during the Friday evening vigil processions, which much have attracted a large crowd.

In fact, these graptai were the equivalent of deaconesses or Widows, in terms of both their eligibility requirements and their duties. With respect to eligibility, it is unclear whether the requirement that the graptai be proper or chaste (semnas) necessarily meant their being widowed, as were deaconesses and Widows, or virginal, as were deaconesses, but the general tenor is the same: the graptai had to be older women who were above reproach.4° As to their functions, although there is no indication that they shared the sacramental duties connected to baptism and Eucharist that female deacons performed in earlier times, the duties of maintaining order and seeing to the needs of the faithful during church services were the same.

Were these graptai ordained? Were they considered clergy? There is no indication that they were ordained, and, since their duties had less to do with active participation in the liturgical services than with the peripheral liturgical duties of overseeing the banner procession at the Friday vigil and keeping order in the church, it is unlikely that they were ordained, particularly since, as previously mentioned, they were not included in the enumeration of the 50 clergy of the Eleousa. On the other hand, they were listed together with the clergy in that section, and were counted as part of the clergy rather than as servants in the section that set forth the remuneration scale for the various clergy. So, why were the graptai listed with the clergy but not officially counted as part of them?
The answer may be twofold. First, the absence of ordained women by this time, due to the disappearance of the ordained female diaconate, may have led the founders and the capital's clergy to entertain not even the possibility of considering the graptai to be ordained, even to a minor order. Note, by contrast, that the certified orphans/lamplighters were listed as part of the clergy. Secondly, the very title, the "rank" (taxis) or order of graptai, accorded them by the monastery's imperial founders may provide a clue. This term or office is unknown: it appears in no ancient, patristic, or Byzantine Greek lexicon, nor in any standard Byzantine reference works, such as the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. However, the literal sense of the term, "written," may relate these women to the Widows of the early Church as opposed to the female deacons. Although the writer of the First Epistle to Timothy uses a different word, katalegestho (to count among, or to enroll), the meaning is identical: these were enrolled women who had an established pastoral, spiritual, and semi-liturgical church ministry and hence were supported by the church (or monastery, in this case), but they were not part of the clergy who participated more centrally in the liturgical services as celebrant, chanter, etc. Thus, they were indeed clergy in its broader sense, but were consecrated as opposed to being ordained to either major or minor orders.

MYROPHOROI — THE MYRRH BEARERS

The Patriarchate of Jerusalem, although autocephalous ecclesiastically, in reality was very closely linked to the Byzantine Church throughout most of the middle Byzantine period, particularly in liturgical terms. The hymnography emanating from the monastery of St. Sabas outside Jerusalem, and certain liturgical practices, especially paschal ones, were exported to Constantinople and other places by pilgrims wishing to recreate the rituals of this most ancient and apostolic of churches. By the turn of the first millennium, Jerusalem had an elaborate and well-established set of rites surrounding the celebration of Easter. One unique element of the Jerusalem rite, of which traces appear in other places (such as the incense-bearing women in the Arta fresco), is the order of myrophoroi, myrrhbearers, who participated in the Holy Saturday and Resurrection services of the Church of Jerusalem.

All four Gospels record that several female disciples of Jesus, unlike the Twelve, attended his Crucifixion and burial, and returned early on Sunday morning with myrrh and spices to anoint his body, only to find the empty tomb and hence become the first evangelists of the Resurrection.

These myrrhbearing women, or myrophoroi in Greek, were celebrated in the early Church for their courage and selfless devotion. The Eastern Church even gave Mary Magdalene the title isapostolos, or "equal to the apostles." In the Byzantine period, the development of the Pentecostarion, the cycle of hymns for the period from Easter to All Saints (the week after Pentecost) included the special commemoration of the Myrrh-bearers on the third Sunday after Easter. At approximately this same time, a special order of women developed in the Church of Jerusalem who were named after these female disciples of Jesus Christ.

It is not known when exactly the order of myrophoroi developed in the Jerusalem Church; when they disappeared is equally unknown. They are not mentioned in early church documents relating to the paschal celebration in Jerusalem, including the detailed description given by Egeria in the late fourth century. However, there are numerous references to these women in a typikon (liturgical rule) of the Church of Jerusalem, contained in a twelfth-century manuscript that apparently is a copy of an earlier work from the late ninth or early tenth century. Egeria's diary and the dating of the original typikon on which the twelfth-century manuscript is based thus provide us with a terminus post quem of the fifth century and a terminus ante quem of the ninth century, since the myrophoroi were clearly an established order by the time the typikon was written. It is likely that they still existed in the 13th century when the extant manuscript was copied from the lost original, although it is also possible that they had become defunct by that time but still existed within institutional memory. Their disappearance thus may coincide with, or postdate by a century or so,
the disappearance of the female diaconate in the Byzantine Church.

Unlike the confusion over the use of the term myrophoroi by certain Russian travelers describing the Great Church in Constantinople, these women definitely cannot be identified with deaconesses, since that order is separately mentioned in the typikon's description of the paschal services.

Thus, the myrophoroi were a distinctive order unique to the Church of Jerusalem. Their liturgical functions are quite clearly spelled out in the Jerusalem typikon, and largely mirror, in a stylized and liturgical fashion, the activities of the biblical myrrhbearing women.

The Jerusalem myrophoroi began their liturgical service early on Holy Saturday morning, when they accompanied the patriarch and his clerical assistants, such as the archdeacon and chanters, to the Holy Sepulcher. The myrrhbearers were to clean and prepare the oil lamps in the Holy Sepul cher, chanting the canon and the liturgy of the hours while they worked. When they had finished cleaning and preparing the lamps, they chanted the "Glory to the Father ..." and a hymn in plagal second tone. A deacon then would chant the litany, and the patriarch would lock the Holy Sepulcher after extinguishing the lamps.

It cannot be stated for certain whether the myrophoroi were included as part of the clergy in the vesper service and for the Divine Liturgy of St. James, since they are not individually mentioned in the rubrics. However, it is likely that their inclusion should be inferred since, at the end of the liturgy, the typikon mentions that the myrrhbearers remained behind and reentered the Holy Sepulcher in order to cense and anoint it. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher was then locked until the return of the patriarch and clergy early the following morning.

For Easter matins, the clergy, which apparently included the myrophoroi, gathered early in the morning at the patriarchate, in the secreton, where they changed into white vestments before presumably returning to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Although the text does not give a full list of clerical orders included, the rubrics for the paschal matins service make it impossible not to understand the term "clergy" to include the myrrh-bearers. Outside the church, the clergy chanted the Easter apolytikion, "Christ is risen," several times as a refrain to psalm verses intoned by the patriarch, who then called out: "Open to me the gates of righteousness; I shall confess the Lord as I enter in," to which the archdeacon responded with another "Christ is risen." Then, The doors of the church are immediately opened and the patriarch together with the clergy enter the church, chanting the 'Christ is risen'. And the patriarch and the archdeacon immediately enter into the Holy Sepulcher, those two alone, with the myrophoroi standing before the Holy Sepulcher. Then the patriarch shall come out to them and say to them [the myrophoroi]: "Rejoice! [or "Greetings!"] Christ is risen." The myrophoroi then fall down at his feet, and, after rising up, they cense the patriarch and sing the polychronion to him. They [then] withdraw to the place where they customarily stand.

The matins service then proceeded normally with the chanting of the canon for Easter, the exaposteilarion, the praises (lauds), and the Easter aposticha. Near the end of the service comes the final reference to the myrophoroi. Following the deacon's chanting of the epakousta, there was a procession to the bema with two of each clerical order: deacons, sub deacons, deaconesses, and myrophoroi. The deacons held censers, the  
subdeacons and deaconesses held manoualia, and the myrophoroi each carried a triskelion. The two myrophoroi took up position one on each side of the Holy Sepulcher, censing throughout the second deacon's reading of the Gospel. At the end of the reading, the myrrhbearers entered the Holy Sepulcher and censed and anointed it.

It is clear that the activities of the myrophoroi in the liturgical services of Holy Saturday and Sunday mimicked those of the original myrrhbearing women: they were present at the tomb, they censed and anointed Christ—in the person of the patriarch—and the tomb, and they even recreated the myrrhbearing women's encounter with the angel(s), or the risen Christ, at the tomb early on Sunday morning.

The typikon leaves many questions unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether there are a number of myrophoroi or only two. Since the rubrics at the end of the matins reads "the two myrophoroi" as opposed to "two of the myrophoroi," it is possible that there were only two in this order. However, only two of each order participated in the matins procession, so, for example, it also says "the two deacons," although there were undoubtedly more than two connected to the church. Therefore, it is possible that there were more than two myrophoroi attached to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, although for practical reasons only two participated liturgically, at least for the Easter matins. In fact, given the Jerusalem Church's propensity to recreate the Passion events as closely as possible, it is likely that there were more than two myrophoroi since the gospel accounts generally list more than two women at the crucifixion, if not at the tomb itself.

A second unanswered question concerns where the particular location was within the church for the myrophoroi when they were not actively participating in the services. Bertoniere finds the reference significant because it suggests that "their role was something of a permanent office." This raises perhaps the most important unanswered question, namely, whether the myrophoroi were ordained. They probably would not have been considered a major order since (1) they do not appear to have had the type of sacramental functions associated with major orders, and (2) they would not have fit into the threefold system of major orders, deacon(ess), presbyter/priest, and bishop, already well entrenched in church practice at least five centuries earlier. Therefore, either they were "consecrated" but not ordained, such as the Widows in the early Church, and probably the graptai already mentioned, or they were ordained to a special minor order of clergy, akin to the level of reader. This latter option seems more likely, given the myrrhbearers' important liturgical functions during the Easter services and the typikon's assumption that they are part of the clergy.

Thus, although there is no ordination rite extant for the myrophoroi, either in the Jerusalem typikon or elsewhere, one may hypothesize that some sort of tonsure, or minor-order ordination (cheirothesia), was likely done for the myrophoroi, for two reasons. First, it would fit with the early and Byzantine Church's practice of clearly restricting liturgical functions to clergy, of either major or minor orders. Eirene-Eulogia and her daughters indeed participated in a liturgical procession, but it was an out-of-doors procession that was not part of a standard liturgical service. Laypersons traditionally did not participate in the worship of the Byzantine Church beyond the activities common to all the faithful; even chanters and readers were ordained as members of the minor orders of clergy. Secondly, as previously discussed, although the typikon gives no definition of the term "clergy," it is apparent from the rubrics at the beginning of the paschal matins service68 that the term must include the myrophoroi since they enter the church with the patriarch and immediately stand at the entrance to the Holy Sepulcher while he enters it with the archdeacon. Thus, while the myrophoroi may have been consecrated by a simple prayer, it appears more likely from their functions as described in the Jerusalem typikon that they were in some way ordained to a type of minor order.

CONCLUSION

While early female church orders such as Widows and deaconesses vanished by the later Byzantine period, meager but important literary evidence demonstrates that women in the Byzantine Church, at different times and in different parts of the Empire, continued to be specially designated for particular liturgical roles, and were even ordained, consecrated, or "enrolled" into various orders. These roles or orders served one, or usually more, of three functions: (1) they honored certain women for their particular devotion to the church; (2) they provided a means for women faithful to be properly cared for during church services, while attending to the demands of social convention; and (3) they evoked the scriptural witness of the apostolic ministry of women to Jesus Christ.

Eirene-Eulogia and her daughters served in a semi-liturgical role that honored them personally by positioning them prominently in a popular weekly procession with the palladium of the city. Moreover, the nature of their liturgical role evoked the myrrhbearers of Scripture, who did not abandon their Lord at his Crucifixion and who later went with myrrh and incense to attend to his body. The myrophoroi of the Church of Jerusalem explicitly imaged the myrrbearing women of the Gospels during the Easter services at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, recreating in a stylistic and liturgical manner the actions of the biblical women for whom their order was named. As for the graptai, they demonstrate that, even after the decline of the orders of Widows and female deacons, the need for a liturgical and pastoral ministry by and for women was recognized even in a male monastery, which responded by essentially recreating the early order of Widows in these older, well-respected women "with the rank of graptai."

The existence of these various orders and groups of women in the Byzantine Church, as with their predecessors in early Christianity, reveals the ambivalence of a male-dominated ecclesiastical hierarchy toward the active liturgical participation of women as more than lay faithful. This ambivalence resulted from, on the one hand, theological notions of women's subordination to men combined with social conventions that limited women's activity to private, domestic space, and, on the other hand, the theological recognition of the spiritual equality of women combined with a pastoral desire to ensure that the Church met the full spiritual needs of its women faithful. Thus, women continued to be excluded from the leadership ranks of presbyters and bishops, and even the female diaconate disappeared with no formal indication in the extant literature of how, when, or why. On the other hand, the service of women in formally recognized liturgical roles continued to fulfill a combination of needs and interests arising from such disparate factors as (1) a culture that imposed sexual segregation and the seclusion of women, (2) a desire to honor publicly and formally those who had contributed much to church life, and (3) the Byzantines' fondness for recreating liturgically the important events in the life of Christ. Thus, while the theology and practice of the Byzantine Church disallowed the ordination of women to most major orders, its pastoral and liturgical concerns for its faithful, specifically for its women faithful, led to diverse and unique roles and orders for some women—as processional incense-bearers, wardens of a public vigil hosted by a male monastery, and liturgical representations of the myrrhbearing women who ministered to Christ. 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment


Category

1915 Armenian Genocide 21st-century Christian martyrs‎ africa al assad Al Qaeda albania anti-Morsi protests Apostles Arab Christian Arab-Orthodox Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov army Asia Australia bank BBC Belarusian Orthodox Church Bethlehem bible Bible movies bible translations bulgaria Bulgarian Orthodox Church Byzantine byzantine music C.I.A. Cairo China Christian Armenians christianity christians christmas Christmas Traditions Christmas tree church Conspiracy Constantinople coptic church copts cyprus daily news Documentary Easter economy Ecumenical Patriarch Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople egypt egypt pope elder Elder Ephraim of Vatopaidi elder joseph of vatopaidi elder Paisios Elder Porphyrios english subtitles Epiphany europe food Fr Seraphim Rose france FREE books FREE Greetings Cards fyrmacedonia Georgian Orthodox Church germany greece greek greek food greek music Greek Orthodox Church Greek Orthodox Easter greek orthodoxy health and medicine Holy Fathers Holy Scripture Holy Tradition icon Internet Interview iran islam islamist israel Italy jerusalem Jesus Christ jews jihad killed libya mafia Middle East Miraculous Icon monastery money mother of god mount athos Mount Sinai Movie Trailers music muslim muslims news orthodox church Orthodox Church in America pakistan Palestine patristic tradition photo photos picture politics pope Prophecy protests quotes recipes religion romania romanian orthodox church Russia Russian Orthodox Church saint Saints science Shroud of Turin Son of God spy St Nicholas of Myra syria The Mount Athos Food Evolution theotokos travel turkey tv UK Ukraine Ukrainian Orthodox Church usa Vatican vatopaidi video war Watch FREE full movie world
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...